The effects of cerclage suture type on pregnancy and neonatal results: Mersilene Suture and Prolene Suture

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare pregnancy and neonatal results with regards the thickness suture material used in transvaginal cerclage operation. Materials Methods: Patients who were subject cervical due insufficiency evaluated a secondary care center between 2103 2021. demographic data, indications (ultrasound induced, prophylactic, or physical examination induced), number weeks at cerclage, type (prolene, mersilene), (McDonald, Shirodkar), total weeks, delivery method (cesarean (C/S), normal spontaneous vaginal delivery) each patient recorded. Additionally, birth weight, 1st 5th minute APGAR scores, intensive unit (NICU) requirements recorded as parameters. divided into two groups regard (mersilene prolene) maternal, compared these groups. Results: included 151 patients total. Prolene sutures for 69 (45.7%) mersilene 82 (54.3%) Cerclage was applied 18 (11.9%) depending on ultrasound findings, 121 (80.1%) emergency 12 (7.9%) history. Gravida increased significantly prolene group (p=0.021). Pregnancy week found be lower [32.5 w (15-40)] [37.0 (15-41)] (15-41)](p<0.001). Ratios birthing below 34 37 57.3% 80.5%, 11.6% 40.6% respectively, statistically significant difference observed (p<0.001). Fetal scores (p<0.05). newborn preterm premature rupture membranes (PPROM) higher (p=0.016, p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion Although have been preferred by doctors many years, more effective amelioration results. Nevertheless, future research comprising other variables that may affect success rates shall helpful determining superiority procedures induced pregnant women.